Журнал: Социологический журнал

Шварц Н., Ойзерман Д.

Как задавать вопросы о поведении в оценочных исследованиях / Пер. с англ. Д.М. Рогозина, О.А. Оберемко

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Выражение признательности

Литература:

• Sudman S., Bradburn N.M., Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: The appli-cation of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996. [Садмен С., Брэдберн Н., Шварц Н. Как люди отвеча-ют на вопросы: Применение когнитивного анализа в массовых обследо-ваниях / Пер. с англ. Д.М. Рогозина, М.В. Рассохиной; Под ред. Г.С. Батыгина. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2003.]
• Tourangeau R., Rips L.J., Rasinski K. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• Social information processing and survey methodology / Ed. by H.J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987.
• Cognitive aspects of survey methodology. Special issue / Ed. by J. Jobe, E. Loftus // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991. Vol. 5.
• Aging, cognition, and self-reports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, D. Park, B. Knauper, S. Sudman. Washington, D.C.: Psychology Press, 1999.
• Context effects in social and psychological research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992.
• Schwarz N., Sudman, S. Autobiographical memory and the validity of retro-spective reports. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994.
• Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communi-cative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
• Cognition and survey research / Ed. by M. Sirken, D. Hermann, S. Schechter, et al. New York: Wiley, 1999.
• Questions about questions / Ed. by J.M. Tanur. New York: Russell Sage, 1992.
• Park J., Kosterman R., Hawkins D., et al. Effects of the “Preparing for the Drug Free Years” curriculum on growth in alcohol use and risk for alcohol use in early adolescence // Prevention Science. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 337–352.
• Belson W.A. The design and understanding of survey questions. Aldershot: Gower, 1981.
• Sudman S., Bradburn N.M. Asking questions: A practical guide to question-naire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1983. [Садмен С., Брэд-берн Н. Как правильно задавать вопросы: Введение в проектирование опросного инструмента / Пер. с англ. А.А. Виницкой; Под ред. Д.М. Рогозина. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2002.]
• Clark H.H., Schober M.F. Asking questions and influencing answers // Ques-tions about questions / Ed. by J.M. Tanur. New York: Russell Sage, 1992. P. 15 48.
• Schober M.F. Making sense of questions: An interactional approach // Cog-nition and survey research / Ed. by M. Sirken, D. Hermann, S. Schechter, et al. New York: Wiley, 1999. P. 77 94.
• Schwarz N. Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
• Grice H.P. Logic and conversation // Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts / Ed. by P. Cole, J.L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press, 1975. P. 41 58.
• Schwarz N. Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation // Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 26 / Ed. by M. Zanna. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1994.
• Schuman H., Presser S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
• Schwarz N., Hippler H.J. Response alternatives: The impact of their choice and ordering // Measurement error in surveys / Ed. by P. Biemer, R. Groves, N. Mathiowetz, S. Sudman. Chichester: Wiley, 1991. P. 41–56.
• Schwarz N., Strack F., Muller G., Chassein B. The range of response alterna-tives may determine the meaning of the question: Further evidence on in-formative functions of response alternatives // Social Cognition. 1988. Vol. 6. P. 107–117.
• Norenzayan A., Schwarz N. Telling what they want to know: Participants tailor causal attributions to researchers’ interests // European Journal of So-cial Psychology. 1999. Vol. 29. P. 1011–1020.
• Lessler J.T., Forsyth B.H. A coding system for appraising questionnaires // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communi-cative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996. P. 259–292.
• DeMaio T.J., Rothgeb J.M. Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996. P. 177 196.
• Willis G., Royston P., Bercini D. The use of verbal report methods in the de-velopment and testing of survey questions // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991. Vol. 5. P. 251–267.
• Jenkins C.R., Dillman D.A. Towards a theory of self-administered question-naire design // Survey measurement and process quality / Ed. by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, et al. New York: Wiley, 1997. P. 165 196.
• Sinclair R.C., Mark M.M., Moore S.E., et al. An electoral butterfly effect // Nature. 2000. Vol. 408. P. 665–666.
• Schober M.F., Conrad F.G. Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error? // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1997. Vol. 61. P. 576–602.
• Conway M.A. Autobiographical memory: An introduction. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1990.
• Brown N.R. Encoding, representing, and estimating event frequencies: Multi-ple strategy perspective // Frequency processing and cognition / Ed. by P. Swdlmeier, T. Betsch. New York: Oxford University Press (in press).
• Cannell C.F., Fisher G., Bakker T. Reporting on hospitalization in the Health Interview Survey. Vital and health statistics (PHS Publication No. 1000, Se-ries 2, No. 6). Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1965.
• Linton M. Transformations of memory in everyday life // Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts / Ed. by U. Neisser. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1982. P. 77–91.
• Neisser U. Nested structure in autobiographical memory // Autobiographical memory / Ed. by D.C. Rubin. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986. P. 71 88.
• Strube G. Answering survey questions: The role of memory // Social infor-mation processing and survey methodology / Ed. by H.J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987. P. 86 101.
• Mathiowetz N.A., Duncan G.J. Out of work, out of mind: Response errors in retrospective reports of unemployment // Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 1988. Vol. 6. P. 221–229.
• Belli R. The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys // Memory. 1998. Vol. 6. P. 383 406.
• Baddeley A. Human memory: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.
• Blair E., Burton S. Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioural frequency questions // Journal of Consumer Research. 1987. Vol. 14. P. 280 288.
• Wagenaar W.A. My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years // Cognitive Psychology. 1986. Vol. 18. P. 225–252.
• Wagenaar W. A. People and places in my memory: A study on cue speci-ficity and retrieval from autobiographical memory // Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Vol. 1 / Ed. by M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, R.N. Sykes. Chichester: Wiley, 1988. P. 228 232.
• Sudman S., Schwarz N. Contributions of cognitive psychology to advertising research // Journal of Advertising Research. 1989. Vol. 29. P. 43–53.
• Belli R., Schwarz N., Singer E., Talarico J. Decomposition can harm the ac-curacy of retrospective behavioral reports // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2000. Vol. 14. P. 295 308.
• Fiedler K., Armbruster T. Two halfs may be more than one whole: Category-split effects on frequency illusions // Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology. 1994. Vol. 66. P. 633–645.
• Poulton E.C. Bias in quantifying judgments. London, UK: Erlbaum, 1989.
• Reiser B.J., Black J.B., Abelson R.P. Knowledge structure in the organization and retrieval of autobiographical memories // Cognitive Psychology. 1985. Vol. 17. P. 89–137.
• Cannell C.F., Miller P.V., Oksenberg L. Research on interviewing tech-niques // Sociological Methodology / Ed. by S. Leinhardt. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publications, 1981. P. 389 437.
• Loftus E., Fathi D.C. Retrieving multiple autobiographical memories // Social Cognition. 1985. Vol. 3. P. 280–295.
• Whitten W.B., Leonard J.M. Directed search through autobiographical memory // Memory and Cognition. 1981. Vol. 9. P. 566–579.
• Bradburn N.M., Rips L.J., Shevell S.K. Answering autobiographical ques-tions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys // Science. 1987. Vol. 236. P. 157 161.
• Loftus E.F., Marburger W. Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? // Memory and Cognition. 1983. Vol. 11. P. 114–120.
• Bradburn N.M., Huttenlocher J., Hedges L. Telescoping and temporal memory // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective re-ports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 203 216.
• Axinn W., Pearce L., Ghimire D. Innovations in life history calendar applica-tions // Social Science Research. 1999. Vol. 28. P. 243 264.
• Caspi A., Moffitt T., Thornton A., et al. The life history calendar: A research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history da-ta / International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 1996. Vol. 6. P. 101–114.
• Freedman D., Thornton A., Camburn D., et al. The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data // Sociological Methodology. Vol. 18 / Ed. by C.C. Clogg. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Associa-tion, 1988. P. 37–68.
• Lyketsos C., Nestadt G., Cwi, J., et al. The life chart interview: A standardized method to describe the course of psychopathology //. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 1994. Vol. 4. P. 143–155.
• Conrad F.G., Brown N.R. Estimating frequency: A multiple strategy perspec-tive // Basic and applied memory: Research on practical aspects of memory. Vol. 2 / Ed. by D. Herrmann, M. Johnson, C. McEvoy, et al. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. P. 167 178.
• Huttenlocher J., Hedges L.V., Bradburn N.M. Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1990. Vol. 16. P. 196–213.
• Menon G. The effects of accessibility of information in memory on judg-ments of behavioural frequencies // Journal of Consumer Research. 1993. Vol. 20. P. 431–440.
• Menon G. Judgments of behavioral frequencies: Memory search and re-trieval strategies // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 161–172.
• Ross M. The relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histo-ries // Psychological Review. 1989. Vol. 96. P. 341–357.
• Withey S.B. Reliability of recall of income // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1954. Vol. 18. P. 31–34.
• Collins L.M., Graham J.W. Hansen W.B., Johnson C.A. Agreement between retrospective accounts of substance use and earlier reported substance use // Applied Psychological Measurement. 1985. Vol. 9. P. 301–309.
• Ross M., Conway M. Remembering one’s own past: The construction of per-sonal histories // Handbook of motivation and cognition / Ed. by R.M. Sorrentino, E.T. Higgins. New York: Guilford, 1986. P. 122 144.
• Moore J.C. Self/proxy response status and survey response quality. Journal of Official // Statistics. 1988. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 155–172.
• Schwarz N., Wellens T. Cognitive dynamics of proxy responding: The diverg-ing perspectives of actors and observers // Journal of Official Statistics. 1997. Vol. 13. P. 159–179.
• Mingay D. J., Shevell S. K., Bradburn N. M., Ramirez, C. Self and proxy reports of everyday events // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 235 250.
• Skowronski J.J., Betz A L., Thompson C.P., et al. The impact of differing memory domains on event-dating processes in self and proxy reports // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 217 234.
• Sudman S., Bickart B., Blair J., Menon G. The effect of level of participation on reports of behavior and attitudes by proxy reporters // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 251 266.
• Jones E.E., Nisbett R.E. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971.
• Watson D. The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent? // Psychological Bulletin. 1982. Vol. 92. P. 682–700.
• Schwarz N., Scheuring B. Selbstberichtete Verhaltens- und Symptom-haufigkeiten: Was Befragte aus Anwortvorgaben des Fragebogens lernen // Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie. 1992. Vol. 22. S. 197–208.
• Gaskell G.D., O’Muircheartaigh C.A., Wright D.B. Survey questions about the frequency of vaguely defined events: The effects of response alterna-tives // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 58. P. 241–254.
• Schwarz N., Hippler H.J., Deutsch B., Strack F. Response categories: Effects on behavioral reports and comparative judgments // Public Opinion Quarter-ly. 1985. Vol. 49. P. 388–395.
• Schwarz N., Scheuring B. Judgments of relationship satisfaction: Inter- and intra-individual comparison strategies as a function of questionnaire structure // European Journal of Social Psychology. 1988. Vol. 18. P. 485–496.
• Tourangeau R., Smith T.W. Asking sensitive questions. The impact of data collection, mode, question format, and question context // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 60. P. 275–304.
• Menon G., Raghubir P., Schwarz N. Behavioral frequency judgments: An accessibility diagnosticity framework // Journal of Consumer Research. 1995. Vol. 22. P. 212–228.
• Schwarz N. Frequency reports of physical symptoms and health behaviors: How the questionnaire determines the results // Processing medical infor-mation in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives / Ed. by D.C. Park, R. Morrell, K. Shifren. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999. P. 93–108.
• Rothman A.J., Haddock G., Schwarz N. How many partners is too many? Shaping perceptions of personal vulnerability to HIV infection // Journal of Applied Social Psychology (in press).
• Ji L., Schwarz N., Nisbett R.E. Culture, autobiographical memory, and behavioural frequency reports: Measurement issues in cross-cultural studies // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000. Vol. 26. P. 586–594.
• Pepper S.C. Problems in the quantification of frequency expressions // Prob-lems with language imprecision, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science. Vol. 9 / Ed. by D.W. Fiske. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981. P. 25 41.
• Nisbett R.E., Wilson T.D. Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes // Psychological Review. 1977. Vol. 84. P. 231–259.
• Parducci A. Category judgment: A range-frequency model // Psychological Review. 1965. Vol. 72. P. 407–418.
• Daamen D.D.L., Bie S.E. de Serial context effects in survey items // Context effects in social and psychological research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992. P. 97 114.
• Schwarz N., Hippler H.J., Noelle-Neumann E. Retrospective reports: The impact of response alternatives // Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports / N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994. P. 187–202.
• Krosnick J.A., Alwin D.F. An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response order effects in survey measurement // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 51. P. 201–219.
• Knauper B. The impact of age and education on response order effects in attitude measurement // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1999. Vol. 63. P. 347–370.
• Rasinski K.A., Mingay D., Bradburn N.M. Do respondents really “mark all that apply” on self-administered questions? // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 58. P. 400–408.
• Demaio T.J. Social desirability and survey measurement: A review // Survey-ing subjective phenomena. Vol. 2 / Ed. by C.F. Turner, E. Martin. New York: Russell Sage, 1984. P. 257 281.
• Krysan M., Schuman H., Scott L.J., Beatty P. Response rates and response content in mail versus face-to-face surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 58. P. 381–399.
• Smith T.W. Happiness. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 42. P. 18–30.
• Barton A.J. Asking the embarrassing question // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1958. Vol. 22. P. 271 278.
• Greenberg B., Abul-Ela A., Simmons W., Horvitz D. The unrelated questions randomized response model theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969. Vol. 64. P. 421–426.
• Horvitz D.G., Shaw B.V., Simmons W.R. The unrelated question randomized response model // Proceedings of the American Statistical Association / Ed. by D. Hasho. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association, 1967. P. 65 72.
• Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating error answer bias // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965. Vol. 60. P. 63–69.
• Singer E., Hippler H.J., Schwarz N. Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 1992. Vol. 4. P. 256–268.

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2004. № 1-2.

>> Архив журнала