Oleg N. Yanitsky, PhD., Professor, Institute of Sociology Russian academy of sciences. On Global Environmental Sociology [Электронный ресурс] ...

Oleg N. Yanitsky, PhD., Professor, Institute of Sociology Russian academy of sciences. On Global Environmental Sociology [Электронный ресурс] ...



Oleg N. Yanitsky, PhD., Professor, Institute of Sociology Russian academy of sciences. On Global Environmental Sociology [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ИС РАН. – 2016. – 12 cтр. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4305

Размещена на сайте: 28.02.16

Текст статьи.

Также см. статью Oleg N. Yanitsky, PhD., Professor, Institute of Sociology Russian academy of sciences. New Developments in Environmental Sociology [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ИС РАН. – 2016. – 11 cтр. URL: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4308



Ссылка при цитировании:

Oleg N. Yanitsky, PhD., Professor, Institute of Sociology Russian academy of sciences. On Global Environmental Sociology [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ИС РАН. – 2016. – 12 cтр. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4305

Аннотация

Some key issues of current debates on global environmental sociology are explicated and discussed. The author’s position related to this discussion is as follows. First, our Planet has transformed into rather complicated sociobiotechnical system. Thus, the past ‘environment-society’ distinction has become conditional and not the adequate methodological base for the above system analysis. Second, this system is governed by the struggle of global stakeholders for resources, economic, social and cultural domination. This struggle produces the all-encompassing and all-penetrating risks. Therefore, there are no absolute safe places on the Planet there are only more or less safe ones only. Third, any environment is not a passive recipient of the by-products of the struggle. Actually, any environment is a complex of actors which in one situation may by considered as actors whereas in others as an environment. Four, every environment has its own carrying capacity. If it is exceeded a particular environment turns from risk-absorber into a risk-producer. Five, all components of the global sociobiotechnical system not only interact but exert impact on each other and above all on cosmic space and lithosphere. Six, a concept of global environmental reform is still disputable because of such reform depends on intentions and aims of global and local stakeholders and of their potential to maintain the global dialogue.

_____________
Рецензия: Статья представляет собой важные размышления в русле энвайроменталистской социологии, имеет высокую актуальность, отражает дебаты в этой области, предлагает свой взгляд на экологическую парадигму и взаимоотношения экологии и рыночных агентов в условиях рисков неравномерно развивающегося мира. Статья подготовлена для публикации на английском языке. 

Рекомендую для публикации на сайте.
к.с.н., рук. центра теоретических и историко-социологических исследований ИС РАН,
Данилова Е.Н.

Ключевые слова:

actor carrying capacity global dialogue global sociobiotechnical system socio-ecological metabolism risks

Авторы:

Яницкий О.Н.

Рубрики:

Социология
Экосоциология



Возможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации: