Mikhaylova, O., Abramov, R. Ideology and Discourse in Contemporary Social Sciences and the Humanities and the Role of Sociology in their Conceptualization. Am Soc 51, 566–583 (2020). https: ...

Ссылка при цитировании:

Аннотация

Discourse and ideology are interrelated concepts in social sciences and the humanities and are even occasionally employed interchangeably. This paper sheds light on their relationship in academic discourse and examines the role of sociology as a scientific field in its conceptualization. Using bibliometric analysis, we examined 15,716 academic publications mentioning “discourse” or “ideology” in their title and written in English by American and British scholars between 1966 and 2015. The investigation focused on the two terms’ conceptual environment, areas of usage, journals, and the organizations to which the authors were affiliated. First, we conclude that although some sociology researchers have attempted to create a sociological definition for the concept of discourse, sociologists are not its most active users. The same is true for ideology. These concepts have established niches in other disciplines (political science and history for “ideology,” and educational science and linguistics for “discourse”). Second, throughout the years, the field of discourse studies has become more diversified and fragmented than that of ideology. Third, the leading organizations in both fields are prestigious American and British universities, which indicates that discourse and ideology are elements of the intellectual elites’ language. Fourth, the concept of discourse was more frequently applied than that of ideology in the years 2010–2015, and we expect that it will remain popular among scholars in the next decade. As for ideology, we believe that new social challenges could foster the rediscovery of this concept in the near future.

Ключевые слова:

Авторы:

Рубрики:

Возможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:

• Абрамов Р. Н.
  Менеджериалъная идеология в России: теоретические истоки и перспективы // Новое и старое в теоретической социологии (Книга 3) / Под ред. Ю.Н. Давыдова. - М.: Изд-во Института социологии РАН, 2003. - Кн. 3. С. 81-122.
• Малинкин А. Н.
  Чудесная особенность социологического мышления. (Об основаниях типологии интерпретаций Карла Мангейма) // Звучащие смыслы: диалог с миром. Культурологический альманах / отв. ред. и сост. С. Я. Левит. – М.; СПб.: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2022. С. 673-693.
• Maslovskiy M. A New Research Agenda in International Relations, Theories of Historical Sociology and Russian “Civilizationism”. CAS Sofia Working Paper Series. 2024. No. 15. P. 1-22.
• Prozorova, Yulia (2017) Civilizational Analysis, Political Discourse, and the Reception of Western Modernity in Post-Soviet Russia, Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 77 : No. 77 , Article 7
• Малинкин А. Н.
  «Критика буржуазной социологии» в Советской России 1920-х годов: рождение жанра // Диалог со временем. 2021. Вып. 77. С. 166-182.

 

?

(none)