Журнал: Социологический журналРогозин Д. М.Когнитивный анализ опросного инструмента

Журнал: Социологический журнал

Рогозин Д. М.

Когнитивный анализ опросного инструмента


Рогозин Дмитрий Михайлович
Институт социологии РАН
сектор социологии знания, аспирант

Полный текст

Открыть текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рогозин Д. М. Когнитивный анализ опросного инструмента // Социологический журнал. 2000. № 3-4. С. С. 18-68.

Рубрика:

ТЕОРИЯ И МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ

Выражение признательности

проведенного Фондом «Обще-ственное мнение» летом 2000 года под научным руководством Г.С. Батыгина и патронажем директора по исследованиям фонда Е.С. Петренко. Особая благодарность М.В. Рассохиной

Литература:

  • Ayidiya S. A., McClendon M. J. Response effects in mail surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 54. No. 2.
  • Bailey K. D. Methods of social research. New York: Free Press, 1987.
  • Bassili J. N. Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What con-tributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice // Personality and social psy-chology bulletin. 1995. No. 21.
  • Bassili J. N. Response latency versus certainty as indexes of the strength of voting intentions in a CATI survey // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 57. No. 1.
  • Bassili J. N. The how and why of response latency measurement in telephone surveys // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Bassili J. N., Fletcher J.F. Response time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at non-attitudes // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 55. No. 3.
  • Bassili J. N., Scott S. B. Response latency as a signal to question problems in survey research // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 390-399.
  • Belson W. R. The design and understanding of survey questions. Aldershot: Gower, 1981.
  • Berger C. R., Bradac J. J. Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London: Arnold, 1982.
  • Bickart B., Felcher M. E. Expanding and enhancing the use of verbal protocols in survey research // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Bolton R. N. An exploratory investigation of questionnaire pretesting with verbal protocol analysis // Advances in consumer research. 1991. No. 18.
  • Bolton R. N. Pretesting questionnaire: Content analyses of respondent’s concurrent verbal protocols // Marketing science. 1993. No. 12.
  • Bolton R. N., Bronkhorst T. M. Questionnaire pretesting: Computer-assisted coding of concurrent protocols // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Bowers K. S., Regehr G., Balthazard C., Parker K. Intuition in the context of discovery // Cognitive psychology. 1990. No. 22.
  • Bradburn N. M. What have we learned? // Context effects in social and psychological research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
  • Bradburn N. M., Sudman S. Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1979.
  • Brenner M. Response effects of ‘role-restricted’ characteristics of the interviewer // Response behavior in the survey interview / Ed. by W. Dijkstra, H. Van der Zouwen. London: Academic Press, 1982.
  • Cannel C. F., Oksenberg L. Observation of behavior in telephone interviews // Tele-phone survey methodology / Ed. by Groves. New York: Wiley, 1988.
  • Cannel C. F, .Fowler F. J. Using behavioral coding to identify cognitive problems with survey questions // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Cannel C. F., Kalton G., Oksenberg L. New strategies for pretesting survey questions // Journal of official statistics. 1991. Vol. 7. No. 3.
  • Cannell C. F., Lawson S. A., Hausser D. L. A technique for evaluating interviewer performance / Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, 1975.
  • Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines / Ed. by T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, R. Tourangeau. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1984.
  • Converse P. E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics // Ideology and discontent / Ed. by D. E. Apter. New York: Free Press, 1964.
  • DeMaio T. J., Rothgeb J. M. Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communica-tive processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996. P. 177-196.
  • DeMaio T. J., Rothgeb J. M., Hess J. Improving survey quality through pretesting // Working papers in survey methodology: U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1998. No 3.
  • Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley, 1978.
  • Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A. Protocol analyses. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1984.
  • Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A. Verbal reports as data // Psychological review. 1980. No. 87.
  • Esposito J. L., Rothgeb J. M., Polivka A. E., Hess J., Campanelli C. Methodologies for evaluating survey questions: Some lessons from the redesign of the current population survey / Paper presented at the International conference on social science methodology. Trento, 1993.
  • Fowler F. J. How unclear terms affect survey data // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1992. Vol. 56. No. 2.
  • Fowler F. J., Mangione T. Standardized survey interviewing. Newbury Park: Sage Publication, 1990.
  • Gallup G. H. The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1935-1971 / 3 Vols. New York: Ran-dom House, 1972.
  • Gallup G. H. The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1972-1977 / 2 Vols. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, 1978.
  • Grice H. P. Logic and conversation: The William James lectures. Harvard University, 1967-1968 // Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts / Ed. by P. Cole, J. Morgan. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • Groves R. M. How do we know what we think they think is really what they think? // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996..
  • Higgins E. T., Bargh J. A. Unconscious sources of subjectivity and suffering: Is con-sciousness the solution? // The construction of social judgments / Ed. by L. L. Martin, A. Tesser. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1992.
  • Hippler H., Schwarz N. Response effects in surveys // Social information processing and survey methodology / Ed. by H. Hippler, N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
  • Index to International Public Opinion, 1978-1979 / Ed. by E. H. Hastings, P. K. Hastings. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1980.
  • Jacoby L. L., Lindsay S. D., Toth J. P. Unconscious influence revealed: Attention, awareness and control // American psychologist. 1992. No. 47.
  • Jobe J. B., Mingay D. J. Cognitive research improves questionnaires // American journal of public health. 1989. No. 79.
  • Jobe J. B., Tourangeau R., Smith A. F. Contributions of survey research to the under-standing of memory // Applied cognitive psychology. 1993. No. 7.
  • Kihlstrom J. F. The cognitive unconscious // Science. 1987. No. 237. P. 1445-1452.
  • Krosnick J. A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys // Applied cognitive psychology. 1991. No. 5.
  • Lazarsfeld P. F. The art of asking why: Three principles underlying the formulation of questionnaires // National marketing review. 1935. No. 1.
  • Lazarsfeld P. F. The controversy over detailed interviews: An offer for negotiation // Lazarsfeld P. F. On social research and its language / Ed. and with an introduction by R. Boudon. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  • Lessler J. T., Forsyth B. H. A coding system for appraising questionnaires ? // An-swering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative pro-cesses in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Luhmann N. The autopoiesis of social systems // Luhmann N. Essays on self reference. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
  • Marquis K. Effects of race, residence, and selection of respondent on the conduct of the interview // Working papers on survey research in poverty areas // Ed. by J. Lansing, S. Withey, A. Wolfe / Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, 1971.
  • Martin E. A., Campanelli P. C., Fay R. E. An application of Rasch analyses to ques-tionnaire design: Using vignettes to study the meaning of ‘work’ in the current popu-lation survey // Statistician. 1991. Vol. 40.
  • Martin E. A., Polivka A. E. Diagnostics for redesigning questionnaires // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 59. No. 4.
  • Morton-Williams J. The use of verbal interaction coding for evaluating a questionnaire // Quantity and quality. 1979. No. 13.
  • Morton-Williams J., Sykes W. The use of interaction coding and follow-up interviews to investigate comprehension of survey questions // Journal of the market research society. 1984. No. 26.
  • Nowak S. Methodology of sociological research: General problems / Translated from the Polish by M. O. Lepa. Warszawa: PWN — Polish Scientific Publishers; Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1977.
  • Nowak S. Understanding and prediction: Essays in the methodology of social and behavioral theories. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976.
  • Oksenberg L., Cannel C. F., Kalton G. New strategies for pretesting survey questions // Journal of official statistics. 1991. Vol. 7. No. 3.
  • Presser S., Zhao S. Attributes of questions and interviewers as correlates of interview-ing performance // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1992. Vol. 56. No. 2.
  • Riesman D., Glazer N. The meaning of opinion // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1948. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 633-648.
  • Schaeffer N. C., Maynard D. W. From paradigm to prototype and back again: Interac-tive aspects of cognitive processing in standardized survey interviews // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publish-er, 1996.
  • Smith E. R., Lerner M. Development of automatism of social judgments // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1986. No. 50.
  • Strack F., Martin L. L. Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys // Social information processing and survey methodol-ogy / Ed. by H. J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. New York: Springer, 1987.
  • Sudman S., Bradburn N. M. Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1982.
  • Sudman S., Bradburn N., Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, 1995.
  • Todorov A. Another look at reasoning experiments: Rationality, normanive models and conversational factors // Journal for the theory of social behaviour. 1997. Vol. 27. No. 4.
  • Tourangeau R., Rasinski K. A. Cognitive processes underlying contexts in attitude measurement // Psychological Bulletin. 1988. Vol. 103.
  • Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods // Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines / Ed. by T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, R. Tourangeau. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press, 1984.
  • Wilson T. D., LaFleur S. J., Anderson D. E. The validity and consequences of verbal reports about attitudes // Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research / Ed. by N. Schwarz, S. Sudman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
  • Whorf B. L. A linguistic consideration of thinking in primitive communities // Language, thought, and reality / Ed. by J. B. Carroll. New York: Wiley, 1956.
  • Zaller J., Feldman S. A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences // American journal of political science. 1992. No. 36.
  • Батыгин Г. С. Лекции по методологии социологических исследований / Учебник для студентов гуманитарных вузов и аспирантов. М.: Аспект-Пресс, 1995.
  • Батыгин Г. С., Девятко И. Ф. Миф о «качественной социологии» // Социологи-ческий журнал. 1994. № 2.
  • Дружинин В. Н. Экспериментальная психология / Изд. второе, дополн. СПб.: Изд-во «Питер», 2000.
  • Карасик В. И. Язык социального статуса. М.: Изд-во Института языкознания РАН, 1992.
  • Ломов Б. Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. М.: Наука, 1984.
  • Луман Н. Теория общества: Вариант San Foca’89: Фрагмент / Пер. с нем. А. Ф. Филиппова // Теория общества: Актуальные проблемы / Под ред. А. Ф. Филиппова. М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц, Кучково Поле, 1999. С. 196-235.
  • Солсо Р. Л. Когнитивная психология / Пер. с англ. Н. Ю. Спомиор. М.: Тривола, 1996.
  • Соссюр Ф. Курс общей лингвистики / Пер. с фр. А. М. Сухотина; Научная ред. пер., предисловие и примечание Н. А. Слюсаревой; Послесл. Р. Энглера. М.: Ло-гос, 1998.
  • Фестингер Л. Теория когнитивного диссонанса / Пер. с англ. А. Анистратенко, И. Знаешева. СПб.: Ювента, 1999.

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2000. № 3-4.
>> Архив журнала