Журнал: Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология:4М)

Калинин Р. Г.

Изучение дистрибутивной справедливости в социальных науках: обзор концептуализаций и методологических подходов

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Аннотация:

Литература:

• Elster J. The Empirical Study of Justice // Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995. P. 81–98.
• Sabbagh C. A Taxonomy of Normative and Empirically Oriented Theories of Distributive Justice // Social Justice Research. 2001. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 237–263.
• Boudon R., Betton E. Explaining the Feelings of Justice // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice. 1999. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 365–398.
• Konow J. Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories // Journal of Economic Literature. 2003. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 1188–1239.
• Binmore K. Natural Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.
• Lamont J., Favor C. Distributive Justice // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 / Еd. by E.N. Zalta. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2017/entries/justice-distributive/ (date of access: 02.05.2020).
• Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Ed. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016.
• Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research / J.A. Colquitt [et al.] // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. No. 3. P. 425–445.
• Folger R., Cropanzano R. Fairness Theory: Justice as Accountability // Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 2001. P. 1–55.
• Colquitt J.A., Rodell J.B. Measuring Justice and Fairness // The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2015. P. 187–202.
• Хоманс Д.К. Социальное поведение как обмен // Современная зарубежная социальная психология. М.: Изд-во Московского университета, 1984. С. 82–91.
• Homans G.C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.
• Adams J.S. Inequity in Social Exchange // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1965. Vol. 2. P. 267–299.
• Cook K.S., Hegtvedt K.A. Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality // Annual Review of Sociology. 1983. Vol. 9. P. 217–241.
• Cook K.S. Toward a More Interdisciplinary Research Agenda: The Potential Contributions of Sociology // Social Justice Research. 1987. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 5–18.
• Modularizing and Integrating Theories of Justice / B. Markovsky [et al.] // Justice / Ed. by K.A. Hegtvedt, J. Clay-Warner. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008. Vol. 25. Р. 345–371.
• T?rnblom K., Kazemi A. Distributive Justice // The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2015. P. 187–202.
• Hegtvedt K.A., Cook K.S. Distributive Justice // Handbook of Justice Research in Law / Еd. by J. Sanders, V.L. Hamilton. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. P. 93–132.
• Jasso G., T?rnblom K.Y., Sabbagh C. Distributive Justice // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 201–218.
• Gollwitzer M., van Prooijen J.-W. Psychology of Justice // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 61–82.
• Liebig S., Sauer C. Sociology of Justice // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 37–59.
• Colquitt J.A., Greenberg J., Zapata-Phelan C.P. What is Organizational Justice? A Historical Overview // Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2005. P. 3–56.
• Justice at the Millennium, a Decade Later: a Meta-analytic Test of Social Exchange and Affect-based Perspectives / J.A. Colquitt [et al.] // The Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013. Vol. 98. No. 2. P. 199–236.
• Liebig S., Sauer C., Friedhoff S. Using Factorial Surveys to Study Justice Perceptions: Five Methodological Problems of Attitudinal Justice Research // Social Justice Research. 2015. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 415–434.
• Perelman C. Justice. New York: Random House, 1967.
• Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1983. Т. 4.
• Харт Г.Л.А. Понятие права / Под ред. Е.В. Афонасина, С.В. Моисеева. СПб.: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета, 2007.
• Сен А. Идея справедливости / Пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина. М.: Ин-т Гайдара; Фонд «Либеральная миссия», 2016.
• H?lle S., Liebig S., May M.J. Measuring Attitudes Toward Distributive Justice: The Basic Social Justice Orientations Scale // Social Indicators Research. 2018. Vol. 136. No. 2. P. 663–692.
• Nozick R. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1993.
• Девятко И.Ф. Понятие нормы в социологической теории: От классических оснований к новым интерпретациям природы норм и множественности нормативных систем // Нормы и мораль в социологической теории: от классических концепций к новым идеям / Под ред. И.Ф. Девятко, Р.Н. Абрамова, И.В. Катерного. М.: Весь Мир, 2017. С. 10–42.
• Persad G., Wertheimer A., Emanuel E.J. Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions // International Journal of STD and AIDS. 2009. Vol. 373. No. 9661. P. 423–431.
• Posner R.A. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2006.
• Кашников Б.Н. Либеральные теории справедливости и политическая практика России. Великий Новгород: НовГУ, 2004.
• Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market // The American Economic Review. 1986. Vol. 76. No. 4. P. 728–741.
• Administering Justice in the Family / H.S. Ross [et al.] // Journal of Family Psychology. 1994. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 254–273.
• Cashdan E.A. Egalitarianism Among Hunters and Gatherers // American Anthropologist. 1980. Vol. 82. No. 1. P. 116–120.
• Fitzhugh B. The Evolution of Complex Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological Evidence from the North Pacific. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
• Burnstein E., Crandall C., Kitayama S. Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. No. 5. P. 773–789.
• Barnett T., Kellermanns F.W. Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm // Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 2006. Vol. 30. No. 6. P. 837–854.
• Гулевич О.А. Социальная психология справедливости. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2011.
• Adams J.S., Freedman S. Equity Theory Revisited: Comments and Annotated Bibliography // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1976. Vol. 9. P. 43–90.
• Hatfield E., Purvis J., Rapson R.L. Equity Theory of Organizations // Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance / Еd. by A. Farazmand. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. P. 1730–1740.
• Walster E., Walster G.W., Berscheid E. Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
• Leventhal G.S. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? // Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research / Еd. by K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, R.H. Willis. Boston, MA: Springer, 1980. P. 27–55.
• Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1999. Vol. 114. No. 3. P. 817–868.
• Binmore K., Shaked A. Experimental Economics: Where Next? // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2010. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 87–100.
• Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. On Inequity Aversion: A Reply to Binmore and Shaked // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2010. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 101–108.
• Levitt S.D., List J.A. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2007. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 153–174.
• Ролз Д. Справедливость как честность // Логос. 2006. Т. 52. № 1. С. 35–60.
• Sabbagh C. Toward a Multifaceted Model of the Structure of Social Justice Judgments: Initial Explorations in Israel and Germany // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2005. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 74–95.
• Konow J., Schwettmann L. The Economics of Justice // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 83–106.
• Deutsch M. Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? // Journal of Social Issues. 1975. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 137–149.
• Leventhal G.S. The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology / Еd. by L. Berkowitz, E. Walster. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Vol. 9. P. 91–131.
• T?rnblom K.Y., Vermunt R. Towards an Integration of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Social Resource Theories // Social Justice Research. 2007. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 312–335.
• T?rnblom K., Vermunt R. Introduction: The Relationship Between Positive and Negative Resource Allocations and How They Affect Our Justice Conceptions // Social Justice Research. 1998. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 377–380.
• Девятко И.Ф. О теоретических моделях, объясняющих восприятие справедливости на микро-, мезо- и макроуровнях социальной реальности // Социология: методология, методы и математическое моделирование. 2009. № 29. С. 10–29.
• Hegtvedt K.A. Doing Justice to the Group: Examining the Roles of the Group in Justice Research // Annual Review of Sociology. 2005. Vol. 31. P. 25–45.
• Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender Differences in Preferences // Journal of Economic Literature. 2009. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 448–474.
• Гофман А.Б. Справедливость как социологическая идея: от классики к современности // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2017. Т. 19. № 1–2(93–94). С. 65–79.
• Hitlin S., Vasey S. The New Sociology of Morality // Annual Review of Sociology. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 51–68.
• Юм Д. Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 2. 2-е изд. / Пер. с англ. С.И. Церетели. М.: Мысль, 1996.
• Смит А. Теория нравственных чувств. М.: Республика, 1997.
• Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.: Эксмо, 2007.
• Smith V.L. What would Adam Smith think? // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2010. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 83–86.
• Rosenberg A. Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2012.
• Девятко И.Ф. Социологические теории деятельности и практической рациональности. М.: Аванти Плюс, 2003.
• Hegtvedt K.A., Johnson C. Justice beyond the Individual: A Future with Legitimation // Social Psychology Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 298–311.
• “Economic Man” in Cross-cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-scale Societies / J. Henrich [et al.] // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2005. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 795–815.
• Talbot C.F., Price S.A., Brosnan S.F. Inequity Responses in Nonhuman Animals // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 387–403.
• Зинченко О.О., Белянин А.В., Ключарев В.А. Нейробиологические механизмы поддержания социальной нормы справедливости: обзор междисциплинарных исследований // Журнал высшей нервной деятельности им. И.П. Павлова. 2018. Т. 68. № 1. С. 16–27.
• Болтански Л., Тевено Л. Критика и обоснование справедливости: очерки социологии градов / Под ред. Н.Е. Копосова; пер. с фр. О.В. Ковеневой. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2013.
• Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
• Рикёр П. Справедливое / Пер. с фр. Б. Скуратова. М.: Гнозис; Логос, 2005.
• Alexander J.C., Colomy P. Traditions and Competition: Preface to a Postpositivist Approach to Knowledge Cumulation // Metatheorizing / Еd. by G. Ritzer. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, 1992. P. 27–52.
• Boehm C. Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame. New York: Basic Books, 2012.
• Nettle D., Saxe R. Preferences for Redistribution are Sensitive to Perceived Luck, Social Homogeneity, War and Scarcity // Cognition. 2020. Vol. 198. Article 104234.
• Binmore K., Samuelson L. An Economist’s Perspective on the Evolution of Norms // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1994. Vol. 150. No. 1. P. 45–63.
• Brosnan S.F. Nonhuman Species’ Reactions to Inequity and Their Implications for Fairness // Social Justice Research. 2006. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 153–185.
• Waal F.B.M., de. Joint Ventures Require Joint Payoffs: Fairness among Primates // Social Research. 2006. Vol. 73. No. 2. P. 349–364.
• Tabibnia G., Satpute A.B., Lieberman M.D. The Sunny Side of Fairness: Preference for Fairness Activates Reward Circuitry (and Disregarding Unfairness Activates Self-control Circuitry) // Psychological Science. 2008. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 339–347.
• Triandis H.C., McCusker C., Hui C.H. Multimethod Probes of Individualism and Collectivism // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. Vol. 59. No. 5. P. 1006–1020.
• Powell L.A. Justice Judgments as Complex Psychocultural Constructions: An Equity-Based Heuristic for Mapping Two- and Three-Dimensional Fairness Representations in Perceptual Space // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2005. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 48–73.
• Fairness in Distributive Justice by 3- and 5-Year-Olds across Seven Cultures / P. Rochat [et al.] // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2009. Vol. 40. No. 3. P. 416–442.
• Baumert A., Schmitt M. Justice Sensitivity // Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research / Еd. by C. Sabbagh, M. Schmitt. New York: Springer, 2016. P. 161–180.
• Haidt J., Graham J. When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize // Social Justice Research. 2007. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 98–116.
• Gibbs J.C. Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. 4th ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2019. 392 p.
• Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism / J. Graham [et al.] // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology / Еd. by P. Devine, A. Plant. New York: Academic Press, 2013. Vol. 47. P. 55–130.
• Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. М.: Академический проект, 2002.
• Alexander J.C. Positivism, Presupposition and Current Controversies. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1982. Vol. 1.
• Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status-Value Formulation / M. Zelditch [et al.] // Sociological Theories in Progress. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. Vol. 2. P. 119–146.
• T?rnblom K.Y. Distributive Justice: Typology and Propositions // Human Relations. 1977. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 1–24.
• Markovsky B., Eriksson K. Comparing Direct and Indirect Measures of Just Rewards // Sociological Methods & Research. 2012. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 199–216.
• Jasso G. Safeguarding Justice Research // Sociological Methods & Research. 2012. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 217–239.
• Jasso G. On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function // American Journal of Sociology. 1978. Vol. 83. No. 6. P. 1398–1419.
• Elster J. Social Norms and Economic Theory // The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1989. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 99–117.
• Binmore K. Economic Man – or Straw Man? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2005. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 817–818.
• Born for Fairness: Evidence of Genetic Contribution to a Neural Basis of Fairness Intuition / Y. Wang [et al.] // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 5. P. 539–548.
• Bolton G.E., Ockenfels A. ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition // American Economic Review. 2000. Vol. 90. No. 1. P. 166–193.
• Bartling B., Fischbacher U. Shifting the Blame: On Delegation and Responsibility // Rev. Econ. Stud. 2012. Vol. 79. No. 1. P. 67–87.
• The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change / Еd. by M.J. Lerner, S.C. Lerner. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.
• Stolte J.F. The Formation of Justice Norms // American Sociological Review. 1987. Vol. 52. No. 6. P. 774–784.
• О чем мечтают россияне: идеал и реальность / М.К. Горшков [и др.]; под ред. М. К. Горшкова, Р. Крумма, Н.Е. Тихоновой. М.: Весь Мир, 2013.
• Салинз М. Экономика каменного века. М.: ОГИ, 1999.
• Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review / H.J. Smith [et al.] // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2012. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 203–232.
• Pritchard R.D., Dunnette M.D., Gorgenson D.O. Effects of Perceptions of Equity and Inequity on Worker Performance and Satisfaction // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1972. Vol. 56. No. 1. P. 75–94.
• G?th W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 1982. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 367–388.
• Быков А.В. Теоретико-методологические подходы к изучению альтруизма: аналитический обзор // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование. 2013. № 37. С. 179–207.
• Jasso G. Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments // Sociological Methods & Research. 2006. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 334–423.
• Rossi P.H. Vignette Analysis: Uncovering the Normative Structure of Complex Judgments // Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld / Еd. by R.K. Merton, J.S. Coleman, P.H. Rossi. New York: Free Press, 1979. P. 176–186.
• Atzm?ller C., Steiner P.M. Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research // Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 3. P. 128–138.
• Rossi P.H., Anderson A. The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction // Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982. P. 15–67.
• Faravelli M. How Context Matters: A Survey Based Experiment on Distributive justice // Journal of Public Economics. 2007. Vol. 91. No. 7–8. P. 1399–1422.
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R. Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics // The Journal of Business. 1986. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 285–300.
• Markovsky B. Anchoring Justice // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 51. No. 3. P. 213–224.
• Hayes T., Guay C. Viewing Equality as a Loss: How Highlighting Policy Costs and Benefits Influences Attitudes // The Social Science Journal. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2019.08.006.
• Babcock L., Loewenstein G. Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self- Serving Biases // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1997. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 109–126.
• Yaari M.E., Bar-Hillel M. On Dividing Justly // Social Choice and Welfare. 1984. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1–24.
• Messick D.M., Sentis K.P. Fairness and Preference // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1979. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 418–434.
• Konow J. Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions // American Economic Review. 2000. Vol. 90. No. 4. P. 1072–1091.
• Webb E.J. Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
• Onghena P. Reactivity // Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
• Социальная справедливость в русской общественной мысли / Ю.Б. Епихина [и др.]; отв. ред. Ю.Б. Епихина. 2-е изд. М.: Ин-т социологии РАН, 2018.
• Grimmer J., Stewart B.M. Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts // Political Analysis. 2013. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 267–297.
• Elster J. Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2019. № 49.

>> Архив журнала