Журнал: Социологический журнал

Демина Н. В.

Концепция этоса науки: Мертон и другие в поисках социальной геометрии норм

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Выражение признательности

Литература:

• Бакштановский В.И., Согомонов Ю.В. Этос среднего класса. Норматив-ная модель и отечественные реалии. Тюмень, 2000. С. 37 40.
• Батыгин Г.С. Как невозможна социология морали // Оправдание мора-ли. Тюмень, 2000. С. 108 119.
• Батыгин Г.С. Организация научного знания: стенограмма лекции, про-читанной в Кубанском госуниверситете [online] URL:
• Батыгин Г.С. Партикуляристское давление в воспроизводстве научного знания // Ведомости / Тюмен. гос. нефтегазовый ун-т. НИИ прикл. этики. Тюмень, 2003. Вып. 23.
• Батыгин Г.С. Этос науки // Ведомости Тюменского государственного нефтегазового университета / НИИ прикладной этики; Под ред. В.И. Бакштановского, Н.Н. Карнаухова. Вып. 18. Тюмень, 2001. С. 39 61.
• Клейн Ф. Элементарная математика с точки зрения высшей: В 2-х тт. Т. 2. Геометрия: Пер. с нем / Под ред. В.Г. Болтянского. 2-е изд. М.: Наука. Гл. ред. физ.-мат. лит-ры, 1987.
• Кун Т. Структура научных революций / Пер. с англ. И.З. Налетова. Общ. ред. и послесл. С.Р. Микулинского и Л.А. Марковой. Благовещенск: БГК им. И.А. Бодуэна де Куртенэ, 1998.
• Малкей М. Наука и социология знания / Пер. с англ. А.Л. Великовича; Послесл. Б.Г. Юдина. М.: Прогресс, 1983.
• Мирская Е.З. P. Мертон и его концепция социологии науки [online] URL:
• Мирская Е.З. Этические регулятивы функционирования науки // Вопро-сы философии. 1975. № 3. С. 131 138.
• Палажченко П.Р. Мой несистематический словарь (Из записной книжки переводчика). 3-е изд., стереотип. М.: Р. Валент, 2003. С. 190 191.
• Социология науки. Учебное пособие. Подготовлено Лабораторией организации и управления наукой факультета государственного управления МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова [online] URL:
• Barber B. Science and the social order / With a foreword by R.K. Merton. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press Publ., 1952. P. 60-100.
• Barnes S.B., Dolby G.R.A. The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint // Euro-pean Journal of Sociology. 1970. Vol. 11. P. 7.
• Bayet A. La morale de la science. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1931.
• Bleurer E. Dementia Praecox, oder Gruppe der Schilozophrenien. Leipzig: Deuticke, 1911.
• Bleurer E. Vortrag ?ber Ambivalenz // Zentralblatt f?r Psychoanalyse. 1910. P. 1.
• Blisset M. Politics in science. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1972. P. 65-89, appendixes A, B.
• Boguslaw R. Values in the research society // The Research Society / Ed. by E. Glatt, M.W. Shelly. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1968. P. 51-66.
• Chubin D.E., Hackett E.J. Peerless science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990. P. 85-91.
• Cohen A.K. The Study of social disorganization and deviant behavior // Sociology today / Ed. by R.K. Merton, et al. New York: Basic Books, 1959. P. 468.
• Cohen P. An eye for patterns in the social fabric // The New York Times. October 31, 1998 [online] URL:
• Cole J.R., Cole St. Social stratification in science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
• Cole J.R., Zuckerman H. The emergence of a scientific speciality: The self-exemplifying case of the sociology of science // L.A. Coser. The idea of social structure. New York: Harcout Brace Jovanovich, 1975. P. 139-174.
• Cole J.R. The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universal-ism // Social Science Information. London: SAGE, Newbury Park, 1989. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 51-76 [online] URL:
• Cole St. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
• Cole St. R. Merton’s contribution to the sociology of science // Social Studies of Science. 2004. No. 34. P. 829-844.
• Collins H.M. Knowledge, norms and rules in the sociology of science // Social Studies of Science. 1982. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 299-309.
• Ern?-Kj?lhede E. Scientific norms as (dis)integrators of scientists? // MPP Working Paper. 2000. No. 14 [online] URL:
• Fisher R.A. Contribution to mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1950.
• Fuller S. Science. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997. Ch. 4.
• Gieryn T.F. Sociology of science [online] URL:
• Hagstrom W.O. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
• Hargens L.L. What is Mertonian sociology of science? // Scientometrics. 2004. Vol. 60. No. 1. P. 63-70.
• Hirsch W. Knowledge for what? // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1965. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 28-31.
• Hooker C.A. Science: Legendary, academic – and post-academic? Essay Review of John Ziman, Real science: What it is, and what it means. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. [online] URL:
• Horowitz I.L. Discussion: professionalism and disciplinarianism: Two styles of sociological performance // Philosophy of Science. 1964. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 275-281.
• Knorr-Cetina K. Merton's sociology of science: The first and the last sociol-ogy of science? // Contemporary Sociology. 1991. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 522-526.
• Knorr-Cetina K. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the construc-tivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
• Latour B. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
• Merton R.K. Social theory and social structure. Enlarged ed. New York: The Free Press, 1968.
• Merton R.K. The ambivalence of scientists // R.K. Merton sociological am-bivalence and other essays. New York: The Free Press, 1976. P. 32-55.
• Merton R.K. The ambivalence of scientists: A postscript // R.K. Merton sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: The Free Press, 1976. P. 56-64.
• Merton R.K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investiga-tions / Ed. and with an intro. by N.W. Storer. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.
• Merton R.K., Barber E. Sociological ambivalence // R.K. Merton. Socio-logical ambivalence and other essays. New York: The Free Press, 1976. P. 3-31.
• Merton R.K. Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press, 1949.
• Merton R.K. Science and technology in a democratic order // Journal of Legal and Political Sociology. 1942. Vol. 1. P. 115-126.
• Mitroff I.I. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo Moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists // American Socio-logical Review. 1974. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 579-595.
• Mitroff I.I. The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo Moon scientists. Amsterdam and San Francisco: Elsevier and Jossey-Bass, 1974.
• Mulkay M. Interpretation and the use of rules: The case of the norms of sci-ence // Science and social structure: A festschrift for Robert Merton / Ed. by T.F. Gieryn. New York: The N.Y. Academy of Sciences, 1980. Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Sciences. Series II. Vol. 39. P. 111-125.
• Mulkay M.J. Norms and ideology in science // Social Science Information. Vol. 15 (4/5). 1975. P. 637-656.
• Mulkay M.J. Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin, 1979.
• Mulkay M.J. Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences // Social Research. Vol. 36. 1969. P. 22-52.
• Nash L.K. The nature of the natural sciences. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1963.
• Pagels R.H. The cosmic code: Quantum physics as the language of nature. New York: Bantam Books, 1982
• Polanyi M. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper and Row, 1958.
• Rosten L. The joys of Yuddish. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. P. 92.
• Scheler M. Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. 1. Berlin: Tod und Fortleben, 1933. S. 225-262.
• Shapin S. Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge // Annual Review of Sociology. 1995. Vol. 21. P. 289-321.
• Speie H. The social determination of ideas // Social Research. 1938. Vol. 5. P. 196 ff.
• Stein M.R. The poetic metaphors of sociology // Ed. by M. Stein, A. Vidich. Sociology on Trial. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963. P. 177.
• Storer N.W. The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
• Sumner W.G. Folkways. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1906.
• Sztompka P. Robert K. Merton: An intellectual profile. London: Macmillan, 1986.
• Tart Ch. States of consciousness and state — specific sciences // Science. 1972. No. 176. P. 1203-1210.
• The ethos of science: Historical traditions and contemporary challenges. International workshop in Oslo, 20th and 21st of September, at the University of Oslo. 2004 [online] URL:
• Toward a metric of science / Ed. by Y. Elkana, J.J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976.
• West S.S. The ideology of academic scientists // IRE Transactions on Engi-neering Management. 1960. Vol. EM-7. No. 2. P. 54-62.
• Whewell W. History of the inductive sciences. 3 vols. Revised edition. London: John Parker, 1847.
• Ziman J. Real science: What it is, and What it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• Ziman J. Prometheus bond. Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge: Cambr. Univ. Press, 1994.
• Ziman J. Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be? // Science. 1998. Vol. 282. Issue 5395. P. 1813-1814. [online] URL:
• Ziman J.M. Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1968.
• Zuckerman H. Sociology of science // Handbook of sociology / Ed. by N.J. Smelser. Newbury, 1988. P. 511-574.

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2005. № 4.

>> Архив журнала