Velikii P.P., Velikaya N.M. Actors of rural autonomous household: meanings and results. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 201–215. Velikii P.P., Velikaya N.M. Actors of rural autonomous household: meanings and results. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 201–215.DOI 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.12ISSN 2307-0331РИНЦ: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47153006Размещена на сайте: 06.01.22 Поискать полный текст на Google AcademiaВерсия статьи на другом языке:Акторы сельского автономного семейного хозяйствования: смыслы и результаты // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2021. Т. 14. № 4. С. 201–215. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.12 Моя книжная полкаотложить >> Посмотреть свою книжную полкуВы сохранили эту публикацию >> Посмотреть свою книжную полкуСсылка при цитировании:Velikii P.P., Velikaya N.M. Actors of rural autonomous household: meanings and results. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 201–215.DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.12Velikii P.P., Velikaya N.M. Actors of rural autonomous household: meanings and results. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 201–215. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.12АннотацияThe article examines the main areas of life of self-employed in agriculture from the position of the meanings of life, defined as the goals – principles of life activity. The self-employed include those heads of households who, having passed the initial adjustment and relying on their human potential, use the reserves of new household forms in the local environment, having partially or completely terminated their labor relations with an agricultural enterprise. They have no farm land, they do not have the status of farmers, nevertheless they live and operate according to similar technology. In terms of material wellbeing they surpass their fellow villagers, who are limited to work in an agricultural enterprise. In the context of free employment choice, these actors adhere to certain attitudes and guidelines, conforming (with varying degrees of completeness) to the norms and requirements of the institutions surrounding them. We have described the problems that arise in families whose lifestyle is determined by the objects of their household – plant and animal life. On the basis of our research we have defined the contours of the self-employment actors’ creativity and the opportunity limitations of implementing the meanings of household, which is explained by the violation of conjugations in interaction with large agricultural entities, destruction of connections and relations in the production and sale of products. We have found that depending on the changes in a family life, with the transformation of such indicators as age, health, achievement of ultimate goals (for example, the completion of children’s education in universities or, on the contrary, their return to the village), the head and family members constantly cross the formal and essential boundaries of the pre-established status, the scale of activity and, in general, the space mastered and not mastered by them. The study of the social experience of autonomous family household contributes to a deeper comprehensive understanding of the deployment of modernization in the village in the context of the conjunction of innovative and traditional trends.Ключевые слова: village farming family household self-employment meanings lifeworld agricultural enterprises, prestige, status, socio-cultural practices, indicators of success Авторы:Великий П.П., Великая Н.М.Рубрики: Социология селаВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Mukhanova M.N. The Transformation of the Socioprofessional Structure Countryside (1994-2009) // Sociological Research, Volume 52, Number 5 / September-October 2013 Pages: 3-17.Смыслы сельской жизни (Опыт социологического анализа) / Под ред. Ж.Т. Тощенко. — М.: Центр социального прогнозирования и маркетинга, 2016. — 368 с.Тощенко Ж. Т., Великий П.П.(2018) Основные смыслы жизненного мира сельских жителей России // Мир России. Т. 27. № 1. С. 7–33.Mukhanova Maria N. The Informal Sector in the Rural Market in Russia // (Un)Making Europe: Capitalism, Solidarities, Subjectivities: View from Russia/ [Electronic resource]: collected papers. 13th Conference of the European Sociological Association (Un)Making Europe: Capitalism, Solidarities, Subjectivities/ Editor-in-Chief V.Mansurov. Moscow: RSS, 2017. – 355 p. Pp. 322-328. 1 СD ROM; 12 sm - system requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/10 - Title from disk label.Мерзликин Н. В.Социокультурные ценности и цели российского села в условиях цифровой трансформации // Вторые декабрьские социально-политические чтения «Как живешь, Россия?». Российское социальное государство и гражданское общество в 2020 году: реализация национальных проектов в условиях постпандемической реальности: материалы научно-практической конференции (Москва, 10 декабря 2020 г.) / Отв. ред. О. П. Новоженина; ФНИСЦ РАН. – М.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2020. С. 297-303. URL: http://испи.рф/product/декчтения-2 ? (none) КОММЕНТАРИИ К ЭТОЙ СТРАНИЦЕ подписаться на RSS ленту комментариев к этой странице ОСТАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ Ваше имя, псевдоним: * E-mail(не публикуется): Введите текст комментария (комментарий будет опубликован после одобрения модератором): * Защита от спама. Пожалуйста, введите сумму двух чисел: 90+1= * Комментарии. Всего [0]: Показаны все записи. Оставить последние 10 ↑