Журнал: Интеракция. Интервью. ИнтерпретацияБаньковская С. П., Идоленко В. В.Искусственный интеллект и видеоанализ в качественной социологии: обзор новейших исследований

Институт социологии
ФНИСЦ РАН

Журнал: Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация

Баньковская С. П., Идоленко В. В.

Искусственный интеллект и видеоанализ в качественной социологии: обзор новейших исследований

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2026.18.2.3
Баньковская Светлана Петровна
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»; ПСТГУ, Москва, Россия
Кандидат философских наук, PhD, профессор кафедры анализа социальных институтов, ведущий научный сотрудник Центра фундаментальной социологии; старший научный сотрудник, лаборатория «Социология религии»
Идоленко Виктория Викторовна
ПСТГУ, Москва, Россия
Религиовед, младший научный сотрудник научной лаборатории «Социология религии»

Полный текст

Открыть текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Баньковская С. П., Идоленко В. В. Искусственный интеллект и видеоанализ в качественной социологии: обзор новейших исследований // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2026. Том. 18. № 2. С. 161-179.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2026.18.2.3. EDN: NCZXKA

Рубрика:

Обзоры

Выражение признательности

Статья подготовлена в рамках проекта «Община и литургия: пространство православного храма в коммуникативных практиках прихожан» при поддержке Фонда развития ПСТГУ и Фонда «Живая традиция» (2025–2026 гг.).

Аннотация:

В статье предложен обзор новейших публикаций, в которых рассматриваются проблемы интегрирования искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) как инструмента в качественные социологические исследования. Особое внимание уделено мультимодальным качественным исследованиям, использующим видеоданные и применяющим видеоанализ как основу методологического дизайна. Обзор более 70 публикаций позволил говорить об особенностях включения ИИ в исследовательский процесс и сопутствующих преимуществах и проблемах, среди которых: эпистемологические и этические вопросы, изменение самой природы данных и процедур их сбора и обработки, взаимодействие ИИ и исследователей на разных этапах исследования, применение мультимодальных больших языковых моделей (MLLM) в видеоисследованиях и др.

Литература:

  • Ворошилова А.И. Искусственный интеллект в социологическом исследовании: опыт использования для обработки и анализа интервью // Социодинамика. 2025. № 2. С. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2025.2.73330 EDN: HSPJRS
  • Галкин К.А., Петухова И.С., Парфенова О.А. OPEN AI как помощник при анализе интервью // Социологические исследования. 2025. Т. 51. № 4. С. 105–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601025040095
  • Пчегатлук С.К., Косивченко Е.В. Искусственный интеллект в социологическом измерении // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2024. № 6. С. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2220-2404-2024-6-34
  • Савинская О.Б. Применение ИИ для разработки категорий в качественном исследовании: что возможно в текущем моменте // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2025. Т. 19. № 3. С. 63–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63973/1998-6785/2025-3/63-72
  • Смирнов В.А. Генеративные нейронные сети в эмпирическом социологическом исследовании: возможности и ограничения // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2025. Т. 19. № 3. С. 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63973/1998-6785/2025-3/52-62
  • Хуснутдинова М., Баранова И., Зубова О. Искусственный интеллект в качественном анализе данных фокус-групп: сравнительное исследование ручного и автоматизированного подходов // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2025. Т. 19. № 3. С. 73–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63973/1998-6785/2025-3/73-83
  • Филипова А.Г., Абросимова Е.Е., Зубова О.Г. Метод синтетических фокус-групп в контексте цифровой трансформации социологического исследования // Социодинамика. 2025. № 5. С. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/24097144.2025.5.74430 EDN: EUMCKL
  • Abramson C.M., Prendergast T., Li Z., Dohan D. (2026) Qualitative Research in an Era of AI: A Pragmatic Approach to Data Analysis, Workflow, and Computation. Annual Review of Sociology. P. 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.12503
  • Akpan I., Kobara Y., Owolabi J., Akpan A., Offodile O. (2025) Conversational and Generative Artificial Intelligence and Human-Chatbot Interaction in Education and Research. International Transactions in Operational Research. Vol. 32. No. 3. P. 1251–1281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13522
  • Artz M. (2026) Multi-Agent Ethnography: Post-Conventional Anthropological Practice Through Human?AI Collaboration. Anthropological Forum. P. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2026.2614501
  • Bankovskaya S.P. (2017) Epistemological Premisses of Converting Video of Social Events into the Narrative. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. Vol. 9. No. 13. P. 39–43.
  • Bola?os F., Salatino A., Osborne F., Motta E. (2024) Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges. Scientometrics. Vol. 129. P. 258–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08565
  • Cabanillas-Garc?a J.L., S?nchez-G?mez M.C., del Br?o-Alonso I. (2025) Voices of Researchers: Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Inquiry. Information. Vol. 16. No. 11. P. 938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16110938
  • Cappello F., Madireddy S., Underwood R., Getty N., Chia N.L.-P., Ramachandra N., Nguyen J., Ke?eli M., Mallick T., Li Z., Ngom M., Zhang, C., Yanguas-Gil, A., Antoniuk E., Kailkhura B., Tian M., Du Y., Ting Y.-S., Wells A., Nicolae В., Maurya A., Rafique M.M., Huerta E., Li B., Foster I., Steven. (2025) EAIRA: Establishing a Methodology for Evaluating AI Models as Scientific Research Assistants (Preprint). Argonne National Laboratory. P. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.20309
  • Cardoso Sampaio R., Chagas V., Sinimbu Sanchez C., Gon?alves J., Borges T., Brum Alison M., Tigrinho C.S., Schwarzer Paz F. (2024) An Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Scoping Review of Emerging Uses of AI in Qualitative Research and Its Ethical Considerations. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa. Vol. 12. No. 30. P. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2024.v.12.n.30.729
  • Cook D.A., Ginsburg S., Sawatsky A.P., Kuper A., D’Angelo J.D. (2025) Artificial Intelligence to Support Qualitative Data Analysis: Promises, Approaches, Pitfalls. Academic Medicine. Vol. 100. No. 10. P. 1134–1149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006134
  • Costa A.P., Burneo Arteaga P., Kasperiuniene J. (2025) Mixed-Methods & AI for Methodological Literature Reviews. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 30. No. 10. P. 4515–4540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2025.8434
  • ?elik N. (2025) New Methodological Trends in Sociology: An Assessment of Recent Studies. Uluslararas? Sosyal Bilimlerde M?kemmellik Aray??? Dergisi. Vol. 8. P. 44–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10444995
  • Davidson T. (2024) Start Generating: Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sociological Research. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. Vol. 10. P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241259651
  • Davison R.M., Chughtai H., Nielsen P., Marabelli M., Iannacci F., van Offenbeek M., Tarafdar M., Trenz M., Techatassanasoontorn A.A., D?az Andrade A., Panteli N. (2024) The Ethics of Using Generative AI for Qualitative Data Analysis. Information Systems Journal. Vol. 34. P. 1433–1439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12504
  • Dellafiore F., Saba A., Collaro C., Artioli G. (2025) Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research: Insights from Experts via Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 36. No. 2–3. P. 145–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251389800
  • Duke M.R. (2026) Artificial Intelligence and the End(s) of Qualitative Data Analysis. Human Organization. Vol. 85. No. 1. P. 8–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2025.2546439
  • Ejjami R. (2024) Integrative Literature Review 5.0: Leveraging AI and Emerging Technologies to Redefine Academic Research. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. Vol. 6. No. 5. P. 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28756
  • Eryaman M.Y. (2025) The Evolving Landscape of Qualitative Research: Exploring the Potential and Navigating the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Vol. 24. P. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251400178
  • Franken L., Vep?ek L.H. (2026) AI in and for Qualitative Research. Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. P. 581–589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44521-8_98
  • Fu X., Zhao L., Wang A. (2025) Intelligent Image Analysis Based on Multimodal Large Models: A Case Study of Visual Ethnography. Guangdong Social Sciences. No. 5. P. 180–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12451/202510.01699
  • Gao Y., Lee D., Burtch G., Fazelpour S. (2025) Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 122. No. 24. P. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2501660122
  • Garcia K., McMahon E., Conwell C., Bonner M.F., Isik L. (2024) Modeling Dynamic Social Vision Highlights Gaps Between Deep Learning and Humans. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). P. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4mpd9
  • Golann J.W., Bougher L., Hall R., Espenshade T.J. (2024) Sharing Big Video Data: Ethics, Methods, and Technology. Sociological Methods & Research. Vol. 55. No. 1. P. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241241277524
  • Grigoryan T. (2025) Weaving Meaning in the Digital Age: A Meta-Meta-Ethnography Enhanced by AI. WCF Education. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33422/wcfeducation.v3i1.1317
  • Gu H., Chandrasegaran S., Lloyd P. (2025) Synthetic Users: Insights from Designers’ Interactions with Persona-Based Chatbots. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. Vol. 39. P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060424000283
  • Guo J., Fang H. (2025) Dialogues of Sense and Algorithm: Reconfiguring Arts-Based Research in the AI Era. Qualitative Inquiry. (Advance online publication). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251393201
  • Heuer H., Glassman, E.L. (2024) Reliability Criteria for News Websites. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3635147
  • Hughes J., Homan L., O’Reilly M., Hughes K. (2025) AI Voice Methodology: Using Generative AI in Qualitative Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry. P. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251401842
  • Jang K.M., Chen J., Kang Y., Kim J., Lee J., Duarte F., Ratti C. (2024) Place Identity: a Generative AI’s Perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 635–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03645-7
  • Jangi?ro?lu N., K???k S. (2025) Recoding Reality: A Case Study of YouTube Reactions to Generative AI Videos. Systems. Vol. 13 No. 10. P. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100925
  • Jarke J., Heuer H. (2024) Reassembling the Black Box of Machine Learning: Of Monsters and the Reversibility of Foldings. In: Algorithmic Regimes: Methods, Interactions, and Politics. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.11895528.7
  • Jarrahi M.H. (2025) Interviewing AI: Using Qualitative Methods to Explore and Capture Machines’ Characteristics and Behaviors. Big Data & Society. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251381697
  • Jowsey T., Braun V., Clarke V., Lupton D., Fine M. (2025) We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. P. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251401851
  • Kapania S., Agnew W., Eslami M., Heidari H., Fox S.E. (2025) “Simulacrum of Stories”: Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research Participants. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713220
  • Kommers C., Hemment D., Antoniak M., Leibo J.Z., Long H., Robinson E., Sobey A. (2025) Meaning is Not a Metric: Using LLMs to Make Cultural Context Legible at Scale. arXiv preprint. P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23785
  • Kong F., Zu W., Chen X., Yang Y., Zhu S.-C., Feng X. (2025) SIV-Bench: A Video Benchmark for Social Interaction Understanding and Reasoning. arXiv preprint. P. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.05425
  • Krapp E., Neuhaus R., Hassenzahl M., Laschke M. (2024) In a Quasi-Social Relationship with ChatGPT. An Autoethnography on Engaging with Prompt-Engineered LLM Personas. Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. No. 79. P. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685501
  • Kulkarni M., Cameron L.D., Gehman J., Glaser V.L., Greenwood M., Islam G., Lindebaum D., Mantere S., Pachidi S., Petriglieri G., Rahman H.A., Vaara E., van den Broek E. (2024) The Future of Research in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven World. Journal of Management Inquiry. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 207–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231219622
  • Kvist M?ller A.H., Airoldi M. (2025) With Eyes of a Machine: A Three-Step Guide for Applying Machine Learning to Visual Content Analysis in Social Research. Big Data and Society. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251343860
  • Latinovi? B., Kr?adinac O., Stankovi? Z., Sto?i? L. (2025) The Sociology of Artificial Intelligence Through the Lens of Ethics in the Digital Age. Journal of UUNT: Informatics and Computer Sciences. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62907/juuntics250201001l
  • Levine M., Philpot R., Nightingale S.J., Kordoni A. (2024) Visual Digital Data, Ethical Challenges, and Psychological Science. American Psychologist. Vol. 79. No. 1. P. 109–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001192
  • Liu J., Su Y., Seth P. (2025) Can Large Language Models Grasp Concepts in Visual Content? A Case Study on YouTube Shorts about Depression. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’25). No. 127. P. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719821
  • Nicmanis M., Spurrier H. (2025) Getting Started with Artificial Intelligence Assisted Qualitative Analysis: An Introductory Guide to Qualitative Research Approaches with Exploratory Examples from Reflexive Content Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Vol. 24. P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251354863
  • Malik F.S., Terzidis O. (2025) A Hybrid Framework for Creating Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Systematic Literature Reviews. Management Review Quarterly. P. 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00522-8
  • Marciniak L. (2026) Two Decades of Reflection and Critique. The Continuous Fear of Replacement — The Renaissance of Feeling and Intuition in the Age of Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Sociology Review (2005–2025). Qualitative Sociology Review. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 6–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.22.1.01
  • Marshall D., Naff D.B. (2024) The Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 92–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646241262659
  • Messeri L., Crockett M.J. (2024) Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research. Nature. Vol. 627. P. 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0
  • Messner R., Smith S., Richards C. (2025) Artificial Intelligence and Qualitative Data Analysis: Epistemological Incongruences and the Future of the Human Experience. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Vol. 24. P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251371481
  • M?ller S., Kempton A., M?nsted T. (2024) Is the Human Is Researcher Dead? Long Live the AI Researcher. Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2024). P. 207–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2024.025
  • Mozelius P., Humble N. (2024) On the Use of Generative AI for Literature Reviews: An Exploration of Tools and Techniques. Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.23.1.2528
  • Pant A., Hoda R., Tantithamthavorn C., Turhan B. (2024) Ethics in AI through the Practitioner’s View: A Grounded Theory Literature Review. Empirical Software Engineering. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 1–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5
  • Paulus T., Marone V. (2025) “In Minutes Instead of Weeks”: Discursive Constructions of Generative AI and Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 31. No. 5. P. 395–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241250065
  • Paulus T., Lester J., Davis C. (2026) The Construction of the Role of AI in Qualitative Data Analysis in the Social Sciences. AI & Society. Vol. 41. P. 1737–1748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02488-3
  • Perkins M., Roe J. (2024) The use of Generative AI in Qualitative Analysis: Inductive Thematic Analysis with ChatGPT. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 390–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.22
  • Pink S. (2025) Artificial Intelligence and the Futures Turn: An Anticipatory Infrastructure for Qualitative Methods. Qualitative Research in Psychology. P. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2025.2570167
  • Retkowski F., Sudmann A., Waibel A. (2025) The AI Co-Ethnographer: How Far Can Automation Take Qualitative Research? In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities. Albuquerque: Association for Computational Linguistics. P. 73–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.nlp4dh-1.8
  • Roberts J., Baker M., Andrew J. (2024) Artificial Intelligence and Qualitative Research: The Promise and Perils of Large Language Model (LLM) “Assistance”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Vol. 99. P. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102722
  • Schwartz S. (1992) Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 25. P. 1–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
  • Seta G. de, Pohjonen M., Knuutila A. (2024) Synthetic Ethnography: Field Devices for the Qualitative Study of Generative Models. Big Data & Society. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241303126
  • Shin J., Hedderich M.A., Rey B.J., Lucero A., Oulasvirta A. (2024) Understanding Human–AI Workflows for Generating Personas. In: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ‘24). P. 757–781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3660729
  • Starovolsky-Shitrit A., Neduva A., Doron N.A., Daniel E., Tsur O. (2025) The Value of Nothing: Multimodal Extraction of Human Values Expressed by TikTok Influencers. arXiv preprint. P. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.11770
  • Susnjak T., Hwang P., Reyes N., Barczak A.L.C., McIntosh T., Ranathunga S. (2025) Automating Research Synthesis with Domain-Specific Large Language Model Fine-Tuning. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3715964
  • Tosi D. (2025) Comparing Generative AI Literature Reviews Versus Human-led Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study on Big Data Research. IEEE Access. Vol. 13. P. 56210–56219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3558096
  • T?rnberg P. (2024) Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Models. Sociologica. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 67–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/19461
  • Tsvetkova M., Yasseri T., Pescetelli N., Werner T. (2024) A New Sociology of Humans and Machines. Nature Human Behaviour. Vol. 8. P. 1864–1876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02001-8
  • Vigren M., Lozano Paredes L. (2026) Struggling With the Black Box: Mapping Bias and Agency in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Method Development. Qualitative Inquiry. P. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261434487
  • Wachinger J., B?rnighausen K., Sch?fer L. N., Scott K., McMahon S.A. (2025) Prompts, Pearls, Imperfections: Comparing ChatGPT and a Human Researcher in Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 35. No. 9. P. 951–966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241244669
  • Wang S. (2025) AI for Social Science: A Sociology PhD Candidate’s Autoethnography on How LLMs are Changing Research Work. AI Magazine. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70046
  • Wheeler K. (2025) How to Use Generative AI to Assist the Analysis of Qualitative Data [How-to Guide]. Sage Research Methods: Data and Research Literacy. In print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036217471
  • Wheeler K. (2026) Technological Reflexivity in Practice: How MAXQDA, NVivo, and ChatGPT Shape Qualitative Survey Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology. P. 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2025.2602820
  • Witte J., Bayer S., Weber I. (2026) Use Cases for the Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Researchers: A Survey. HAL. P. 1–41.
  • Zhang L., Fan J., Wu Y. (2024) Review of Computer Vision Research in the Social Science Perspective: Theory, Methods, and Prospects. New Media & Network. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 24–39.

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2026. Том. 18. № 2.
>> Архив журнала